Vă rugăm să alegeți țara în care doriți să investiți
După ce selectați țara, vă vom afișa doar fondurile care pot fi tranzacționate în acea țară. Puteți modifica selecția oricând mai târziu, în fila „Selectare Țară”.
Notificare legală
Nu se oferă consultanță investițională sau servicii de brokeraj pe acest site. Nu se solicită informații despre toleranța la risc a utilizatorului, comportamentul investițional sau circumstanțele sale personale și financiare. Scopul exclusiv al acestui site este de a oferi informații referitoare la sustenabilitatea diverselor fonduri de investiții. Înainte de a încheia sau rezilia un contract, ar trebui să vă informați cu privire la costurile, oportunitățile și riscurile unui produs.
Operatorii site-ului myfairmoney.ro au primit informații despre investițiile listate de la emitent sau de la terți. Nu a fost efectuată nicio verificare pentru a se asigura că informațiile furnizate sunt corecte și actualizate. Nu se asumă nicio răspundere pentru aceste informații. Informațiile pot fi modificate sau completate în orice moment, fără notificare prealabilă. Operatorii nu sunt obligați să actualizeze sau să revizuiască baza de date în niciun fel.
Baza de date pentru fonduri
Baza noastră de date cu fonduri include peste 15.500 de fonduri europene și 30 de filtre de sustenabilitate. Acest videoclip explică diferitele funcții și criterii de filtrare.
15340 Funds
DK0062493029
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.42
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Neevaluat
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
GB00BH3H2446
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
2.06
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
d
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
DE000A2QAYL7
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Neevaluat
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
1 Sterne
GB00B3B0FF94
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.53
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Neevaluat
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
GB0004456900
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
-0.89
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
IE0007UJ6IE0
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
-0.46
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
LU2012947540
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.29
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Neevaluat
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
IE00BYSZ5R67
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
GB00BHGHFV97
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.59
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
LU1719066794
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
IE00BMW42637
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
-6.48
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
LU2250732281
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.75
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Neevaluat
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
CH0002795729
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.95
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Neevaluat
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
IE00BC7GZJ81
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
LU0322250985
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.27
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
b
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
ES0138321031
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.29
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Neevaluat
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
CH0507420146
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
LU1390062245
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.8
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
FR0011212547
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Neevaluat
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
LU1681041205
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG
Evaluarea fondului ISS ESG include factori de mediu, sociali și de guvernanță corporativă. Mai multe stele înseamnă că un fond are performanțe relativ mai bune decât grupul său similar. Un scor ESG absolut este afișat în vizualizarea de detaliu. Totuși, aceștia nu sunt indicatori ai impactului fondului de a fi făcut companiile mai sustenabile sau de a le face mai sustenabile în viitor.
Atunci când un fond nu este evaluat, pragurile necesare pentru evaluare nu au fost atinse. Vă rugăm să găsiți mai multe informații despre metodologie în glosar. (Sursa datelor: ISS ESG)
- Neevaluat
Compare funds
Loading...