MyFairMoney is partnering with the Make My Money Matter campaign. If you are contributing to a pension in the UK, act today.
Please choose the country you want to invest in
Fund database
Our fund database includes more than 15.500 European funds and 30 sustainability filter. This video explains the different functions and filter criteria.
Data protection notice
When you play our YouTube/Vimeo videos, information about your use of YouTube/Vimeo is transmitted to the operator in the USA and may be saved.
16317 Funds
LU0151358677
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.1
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
GB00B032C178
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.04
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
GB0001531754
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
-1.01
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
AT0000A2HVC3
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
2.84
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Stern(e)
LU2611732475
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
CH0214975366
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
LU1681037518
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
-0.03
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Stern(e)
IE00BCBJF711
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.13
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
FI0008812540
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
GB0030029069
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.47
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
IE000I7E6HL0
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
LI0015327757
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
2.58
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
IE00BMDH1538
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
2.56
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
3 Stern(e)
LU0616839501
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
b
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
DE000ETFL383
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
-0.3
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Stern(e)
IE00BPRCH686
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.32
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
GB0001572295
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
LU1191877379
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
DE0009792176
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.93
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Stern(e)
LU0562822386
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.85
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
Compare funds
Loading...