MyFairMoney is partnering with the Make My Money Matter campaign. If you are contributing to a pension in the UK, act today.
Please choose the country you want to invest in
Fund database
Our fund database includes more than 15.500 European funds and 30 sustainability filter. This video explains the different functions and filter criteria.
Data protection notice
When you play our YouTube/Vimeo videos, information about your use of YouTube/Vimeo is transmitted to the operator in the USA and may be saved.
15340 Funds
DE000DK2D7V3
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
0.19
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Sterne
GB0003936258
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
IE00BWGC5Q41
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
0.55
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Sterne
DE000A1H6HH3
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
0.61
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
2 Sterne
FR0000987703
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
GB0004428735
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
CH1318029480
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1 Sterne
LU1873131392
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
DE000A0D8QM5
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
GB00B0V9V025
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
-5.15
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
3 Sterne
FR0010541425
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
0.92
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Sterne
DK0060442713
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
0.79
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Sterne
IE00092Y2E77
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
1.32
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Sterne
LU2035036107
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
AT0000607387
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
0.78
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Sterne
ES0109360034
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
0.82
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Sterne
LU1073899624
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
-0.32
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Sterne
LU2750480548
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
b
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
IE00BYZ09279
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
1.4
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
3 Sterne
IE000Q0IU5T1
SDG Assessment The SDG Assessment evaluates a fund's alignment with internationally recognised climate scenarios for achieving the Paris Climate Agreement, with the goal of limiting global warming to 1.5 °C. The better the most climate relevant companies in the fund are aligned, the better the score. However, this is not an indicator of the impact of the fund to have directly reduced climate-damaging emissions or to reduce them in the future. If a fund does not have a rating, then the required thresholds for the rating have not been met. More information in the glossary. (Data source: RMI)
0.82
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Sterne
Compare funds
Loading...