MyFairMoney is partnering with the Make My Money Matter campaign. If you are contributing to a pension in the UK, act today.
Please choose the country you want to invest in
Fund database
Our fund database includes more than 15.500 European funds and 30 sustainability filter. This video explains the different functions and filter criteria.
Data protection notice
When you play our YouTube/Vimeo videos, information about your use of YouTube/Vimeo is transmitted to the operator in the USA and may be saved.
15285 Funds
IE0006FDYJF8
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.19
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
b
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
3 Stern(e)
LU0061474705
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.34
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
LU2492356105
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4.67
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
c
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Stern(e)
AT0000781679
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
2.89
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Stern(e)
GB00BHGHFW05
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.43
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Stern(e)
LU0096650303
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.54
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
3 Stern(e)
GB00B1L9GZ93
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.13
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
GB0034021864
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.63
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
5 Stern(e)
FR0013397874
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
-0.43
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
GB00B3DBGT16
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.48
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
GB00BSXYFQ57
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
IE000XEP6VI3
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
AT0000754668
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.28
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
LU1049888578
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.24
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
a
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
ES0168799056
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
0.81
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
2 Stern(e)
DE000A2DTLT5
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
GB0002042884
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
- Not rated
IE000RTIWJD4
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
-1.81
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
SE0016609275
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1.02
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
1 Stern(e)
LU2195490755
SDG Assessment
The SDG Assessment score reflects how well the companies in a fund align with the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as climate action, quality education, or clean water. The score is based on a weighted average of the fund holdings' SDG Solutions Score values and ranges on a scale from -10.0 to 10.0. For each holding, the SDG Solutions Score sums its highest positive and lowest negative impact on the SDGs, ranging from -10 to +10.
A higher SDG Assessment score indicates a greater average share of investments in companies with a net positive contribution to the SDGs. However, this is not an indicator of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future. If you have any queries regarding the company data, please contact ISS ESG directly. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
-1.3
Climate Stewardship Direct dialogue with a company and the exercise of voting rights has been shown to be one of the most effective strategies for positive climate impact by investors. The British NGO InfluenceMap has rated large asset managers in terms of their climate influence (so-called climate stewardship). The better an asset manager's climate stewardship, the better the rating. Both company data and external data were used for this purpose. The rating is the same for all funds of the asset manager. If a fund has no rating, the asset manager has not yet been rated due to its relatively small size. Read more in the glossary. (Data source: InfluenceMap)
- Not rated
ISS ESG Fund Rating
The ISS ESG Fund Rating includes environmental, social and corporate governance factors. More stars mean that a fund performs relatively better than its peer group. An absolute ESG score is displayed in the detail view. However, these are not indicators of the fund's impact to have made companies more sustainable or to make them more sustainable in the future.
When a fund is not rated, the required thresholds for the assessment weren't reached. Please find more information about the methodology in the glossary. (Data source: ISS ESG)
4 Stern(e)
Compare funds
Loading...